What Is Enlightenment?

One of the first things that people notice when they embark on the spiritual journey is that there are many seekers and only a few “enlightened” beings. To me, the only possible explanation for this mismatch, is not that “enlightenment” is so hard to find but that we tend to look in the wrong places for it. And I think the reason for this is that the Eastern cultural context makes it sound much more exotic than it actually is. In this post I would like to look at the question of enlightenment from a more Western perspective and thereby de-mystify and clarify it a bit.

Let’s start very basic.

The French philosopher Albert Camus once said that the most important philosophical question is to whether to commit suicide or not. Or in other words: what is it that keeps us going? Why not just quit life? I would posit that the answer to this question is “meaning”. The surest way to get a suicidal depression is by convincing ourselves that life is meaningless. An the best way to spark enthusiasm is to find a reason to live for.

The question that now arises is: what is “meaning”? Meaning is where our bliss is, and bliss is when we feel most genuinely alive. To feel alive our senses need to be attuned to the immediacy of what is going on (“now”), they need to be receptive. The more we are stimulated sensually, the more our being is enlivened and the more gratitude we feel for being alive. When the “doors of perception” open, life reveals itself as the “mysterium tremendum et fascinans” that it is. The senses are the gates to the kingdom of heaven.

What competes with the immediate reality of “now”, is the symbolic, representational reality of the mind. The mind is where we abstract the world, where we leave what actually “is” and enter what we think about what “is”. This ability is of vital importance for the survival of our species but it does not provide “meaning”. A reality of ideas has no “juice” in it. It is an empty shell that cannot touch our being.

So, then, how do we “get out” of our minds? The short answer is: by not getting “into” it. We get into our minds whenever we do not accept what “is”, that is, when we try to exercise (conscious) control, when we judge or when we think about the past or the future. All “enlightening” practices, therefore, in some way or other have something to do with the relinquishing of control, the suspension of judgement or discrediting the belief in a better past or future.

As I have written in this blog a few times before, we cannot accept what “is”. We cannot enlighten ourselves. Trying to accept is like trying to let go by grasping. The only way to accept what “is” is to trust and to fall in love with what “is”. So, the only reason we cannot be “here, now”, cannot find “meaning” in life, is because we don’t trust and love it unconditionally. Solitude, silence, meditation, chanting, rituals, psychedelics, etc. have been used for millennia to develop this trust and fall more and more in love with what “is”.

So, to be enlightened is to be a lover of life (or to be “intimate with all things”, as the great Zen Master Dogen put it). Such a person lives for life’s sake and not for any particular purpose. Life becomes its own purpose, just as the lover’s sole purpose of life is to be in the presence of the Beloved. When life is loved unconditionally there is no point in changing it, and so, all striving ceases. This marks a new beginning.

In the same spirit, Albert Camus’ answer to his own philosophical question was: “live to the point of tears”.

“The on-going WOW is happening, right now.”
~Speed Levitch

Transcript of a fantastic video clip (click here) from the movie “Waking Life” featuring Speed Levitch:

On this bridge, Lorca warns: life is not a dream. Beware, and beware, and beware!
And so many think because then happened, now isn’t. But didn’t I mention, the on-going WOW is happening, right now!

We are all co-authors of this dancing exuberance, where even our inabilities are having a roast! We are the authors of ourselves, co-authoring a gigantic Dostoevsky novel starring clowns!

This entire thing we’re involved with called the world, is an opportunity to exhibit how exciting alienation can be.

Life is a matter of a miracle, that is collected over time by moments flabbergasted to be in each others’ presence.

The world is an exam, to see if we can rise into the direct experiences. Our eyesight is here as a test to see if we can see beyond it, matter is here as a test for our curiosity, doubt is here as an exam for our vitality.

Thomas Mann wrote that he would rather participate in life than write a hundred stories. Giacometti was once run down by a car, and he recalled falling in to a lucid faint, a sudden exhilaration, as he realized at last, something was happening to him.

An assumption develops that you can not understand life and live life simultaneously. I do not agree entirely, which is to say I do not exactly disagree. I would say, that life understood is life lived. But the paradoxes bug me. And I can learn to love, and make love to the paradoxes that bug me. And on really romantic evenings of Self, I go salsa dancing with my confusion.

Before you drift off, don’t forget, which is to say remember. Because remembering is so much more a psychotic activity than forgetting. Lorca, in that same poem, said that the iguana will bite those who do not dream. And, as one realizes, that one is a dream-figure in another person’s dream: that is self-awareness!


11 Comments on “What Is Enlightenment?”

  1. tiramit says:

    Thanks for a nice post. I like very much what you’re saying about the meaning of ‘meaning’ and ‘getting out of our minds’. The only way is to fall in love, unconditionally, with what ‘is’. And ‘life becomes its own purpose.’ It has answered a couple of questions for me. What I’m interested in is how sensory input is the means by which the outer world enters the inner being, ‘the senses are the gates to the kingdom of heaven’ and what leads on from there….

    • Thank you for your comment!
      To me, there is no distinction between outer and inner because both are realms of experience.

      • tiramit says:

        This is new to me. In the context of ‘there is no distinction…’, how would you describe the situation of air entering the body in the act of breathing?

      • I am not a chemist, so I don’t really know.
        What I wanted to point to, though, is that, both air (outer) and body (inner) are experiences. So on that level there is no distinction, they are “one”. Or on a more broad level, the foundation of the sense of a separate individual and the foundation of the sense of the environment are the same: consciousness or awareness or what you want to call it. All that we know is what we feel and sense genuinely, and that’s the ultimate reality (or the “Truth”). And because we can’t help but be conscious, we can’t help but being constantly bathed in Tao/ Brahman/ Void, etc. Unfortunately, we don’t see it that way so we pay more attention to our mind-made realities, than to the ultimate/ sensual reality. So, we lose the cabability of being touched by what “is” and always seek for something else, somewhere else…

      • tiramit says:

        Thanks for that.
        It makes sense. That’s how it is for me right now, I can see it logically, so far no convincing first-hand experience. It’s helpful to have these observations. I’m following the Theravadin path, mostly – the Buddha made little reference to non-duality and I’m curious about that.

      • I interpret the dharma seals of dukkha, anicca and anatta as “there is suffering because of the ignorant belief in a permanent, (separate) self”. In that sense, the whole cycle of suffering is based on the ignorance about ultimate reality. The message of non-dual teachings are pointing to exactly that. If what we sense and feel is the ultimate reality, even the sense of self is not different from this “one” reality. The reason I chose the crow in front of the moon as my little gravatar picture is to symbolize that. The crow “appears” when in front of the contrasting moon, but it gets completely “swallowed up” by the darkness once it has flown by. That is to say: the “light” of the moon (consciousness) makes manifest the crow (reality) out of the “darkness” (the void). So, the source of all manifestation, incl. the sense of self, is consciousness. Hence, there is no permanent, separate self, because the self, like everything else, is a sensory experience. The experiencer is itself an experience! There is only experienc-ing. So, then, what is this consciousness? It is the sensory organ of the void (the universe). By seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting and touching, the universe experiences itself through us, that is, through itself. Whatever we sense and feel is the universe sensing and feeling itself. We are what the universe is doing, we came out of it, we are its fruits. To realize that is to lose one’s objection to “what is” (to oneself!) and to rest in the eternal present.

      • tiramit says:

        Thanks for your reply, it carries a lot of meaning for me, particularly: ‘the self, like everything else, is a sensory experience… the experiencer is itself an experience…’ I’m seeing it now in quite a different way. I suppose the Buddha didn’t refer to this specific point because he thought most people would get attached to it as an object in duality. Is this what the Jesus teachings is about?

  2. Hi. I saw some hits from your blog on Awakening Clarity, and so I wanted to drop by and have a look at what you do. Nice site! I’m adding you to AC’s blog list; thanks for the honor of being on yours.

    In peace,

  3. […] 2. ‘The self is a sensory experience’ arose from a dialoge with Truthless Truth last […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s